The COVID-19 Chronicles: Part 3 – The Medical Mafia and their Tentacles

Welcome to part three of this COVID-19 series.

If you have read the last two parts already, well:

If you haven’t read them yet, I recommend going back and having a peruse.

In Part 1 of this series, we discussed:

1. The artificial inflation of COVID-19 deaths
2. The use of blatant propaganda from the Main Stream Media (MSM)
3. Censorship of dissenting voices by Big Tech

In Part 2 of this series, we discussed:

1. The vilification and suppression of cost effective, safe and easily dispersed treatments
2. The fast tracking of a vaccine from multilateral organisations with indemnification for manufacturers and governments
3. World Health Organisation (WHO) officials saying their will be no end to the pandemic even with a vaccine

We also observed how the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) is tied to a lot of the multilateral health organisations surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, and the many conflicts of interest that arise from these connections. Since this one foundation has so much influence, I decided to provide a list of their ties:

The list is structured as such:

Organisation: their role during the COVID-19 “pandemic” (How the BMGF are connected to the organisation)

• WHO: leading and coordinating the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic response (largest donor)
• CEPI: financing development of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (co-founder)
• GAVI: financing development of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (founding partner & member)
• GLOPID-R: network coordinating COVID-19 funding (member)
• IAVI: collaborating with Merck to develop an investigational vaccine against COVID-19 (Multiple grants)
• NIH: working on COVID-19 vaccine / therapeutic solution (donor and consultant)
• NIAID: developed mRNA-1273 vaccine with Moderna (provided grant)
• Moderna: COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273) development (provided grant)
• European Commission: proposing legislation and implementing decisions (multiple grants)
• Novavax: COVID-19 vaccine development (provided grant)
• AstraZeneca: COVID-19 vaccine development (provided funding through GAVI and CEPI)

In addition, we scrutinised Bill Gates’ sentiments on the COVID-19 situation, which are:

• Life cannot return to normal until we have an amazing vaccine
• The vaccine needs to be fast tracked
• 7 billion people should receive this inoculation
• Indemnification is needed for governments and vaccine manufacturers

This is despite the fact that many cheap and effective treatments are currently on the market, such as hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and Chlorine Dioxide (MMS).

The more we dissect this pandemic, the more it looks manufactured, or at the very least blown completely out of proportion, through carefully crafted propaganda and deceitful “science”.

In this article we will be exploring the shady histories of some of the top health leaders pushing the COVID-19 narrative, and the various organisations they are attached to. The goal of this write up isn’t to cover every single connection but rather to paint a larger more generalised picture of how incestuous and corrupt these medical authorities are.

The article will be structured as such:

1. The Medical Mafia
   • Tedros Adhanom
   • Bill Gates
   • Dr. Anthony Fauci
   • Dr. Deborah Birx
2. PEPFAR and the Global Fund
3. The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB)
4. Event 201: A Global Pandemic Exercise
5. The Grand Unifying Global Medical Mafia Flowchart

The Medical Mafia

This is a huge topic that dates all the way back to the turn of the 20th Century, when John D. Rockefeller, through the Carnegie Institute, muscled out holistic medicine and established the current axiom of treatment known as allopathic medicine. Since then it has grown and grown, becoming more hierarchical and authoritative, viewing people with disease as potential profit while proclaiming all other healing quackery. And while allopathic medicine most certainly has its place, it unfortunately has become the equivalent of The Empire in Star Wars, only it has pharmaceutical and multilateral organisations at the helm, not a wrinkly old dude in a dark robe (actually, just swap out the robe for a suit and it’s the same).

There is no denying that modern medicine has helped countless people over the decades, however most people don’t realise that they have been (and are) the victims of carefully crafted propaganda, which seems to be the reason why so many people have a disconnect in their mind when it comes to corruption within medicine. All other institutions can be corrupt, but not the medical scientific community, for whatever reason, they are incorruptible. They falsely equate more money being pumped into health organisations as more lives being saved. But just like the other cogs of authoritative society, they are as equally corrupt.

To save space in this article and keep things on track, I will be focusing on people and organisations surrounding the COVID-19 “pandemic”. As it is impossible to cover every individual and organisation involved, I will be limiting the discussion to a handful of big players who share the limelight. To begin, I will start at the top, with the WHO and Tedros Adhanom.

Tedros Adhanom

As many of you know, Tedros Adhanom is the current director-general of the WHO, the organisation leading and coordinating the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic response. While Tedros initially copped backlash early in the pandemic for failing to warn the world about the nature of COVID-19, the larger part of 2020 saw him being painted as one of the many heroic health leaders helping to quell the spread of COVID-19. With all the craziness going on this past year, few people have actually stopped to ask who this man really is, and how he rose to the position he is in today. In fact, many would be surprised to find out that he doesn’t actually hold a medical degree and that his past is shrouded in controversy which, for the most part, is purposefully overlooked or downplayed by the MSM, as it would draw attention the authenticity of this man and the position he holds. These overlooked details, such as Tedros being part of a listed terrorist group, are discussed in this excellent short video put together by John Martin:

Bitchute link.

He has also put together a great article on Adhanom, which I strongly recommend reading:

A few key paragraphs from the article (emphasis mine):

“Aside from his medical credentials, Tedros happens to be a member of the Tigray People’s Liberation Front (TPLF) which is an organisation about as peaceful as its name suggests. Founded as a communist revolutionary party that came to power in 1991, it led a guerrilla campaign against the Mengistu dictatorship and formed a coalition with two other ethnic parties after his exile. …

The TPLF was listed as a terrorist organisation by the US government in the 1990s, and is still listed as one by the Global Terror Database because of its unfortunate habit of carrying out armed assaults in rural areas. …

Not content with denying aid to political dissidents, Tedros was also health minister at a time when the regime was accused of covering up epidemics.  A cholera outbreak spread the region in 2007, infecting thousands in neighbouring countries. When it spread to Ethiopia, the government simply renamed the outbreak and called it Acute Watery Diarrhoea (AWD). International organisations were pressured not to call it Cholera (despite the UN testing the infected and finding Cholera), and were pressured by government employees not to reveal the number of infected. Another stunning victory for the health minister. …

Ethiopia, until very recently, remained one of the world’s worst human rights violators, receiving a score of 19 out of 100 on the human freedom index for 2018, and a score of 150 out of 180 for freedom of the press. The government has remained in power since the takeover in 1991, and was seemingly so popular that it won more than one election by 100% of the vote. …

According to health researcher Soniah Shah, the role that large drug companies played in shaping global health policy created a serious conflict of interest on the one hand to improve the companies’ public image, but on the other to protect their financial interests. This led to cases like lobbying to weaken patent laws for new drugs in India, and blocking laws in South Africa that attempted to make HIV treatment more accessible.

The serious misallocation of funds by the organization was made most apparent in 2016 when it was found that the WHO spent $200 million a year on travel expenses, not even including those paid for by the host country. Another absolutely damning report issued by the Associated Press, reported that WHO employees working to relieve the Cholera epidemic in Yemen had actually siphoned off the funds for officials. Some of these workers were later not even removed from their jobs.”

It makes you wonder how a guy with no medical degree, who was a member of a listed terrorist organisation, rose up to become a leader of world health?

Not to mention coming from a country that is one of the worst human rights violators…

I mean, having Tedros Adhanom at the helm of the WHO is kind of like having Hannibal Lecter as the director of the North American Meat Institute (NAMI); very questionable to say the least.

The article above also mentions how large drug companies can help shape global health policy through lobbying.

Lets explore this idea with respect to the WHO, the organisation Tedros leads.

As we can see below, now that the US has stopped its funding, the BMGF and GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation) have become the two largest financiers of the WHO:

While they are technically not private drug companies, they both share a common goal: to provide vaccines to the entire world. A mission that requires a lot of money being pumped into the private sector (pharmaceuticals).

Remember last article how we discussed that cheap, effective and existing treatments for COVID-19 were being vilified and blocked, while a rushed vaccine was being pushed as the only viable solution?

Well it should make sense now, seeing that the two largest financiers of the WHO (the organisation coordinating the COVID-19 “pandemic” response) are all about vaccine development!

This is a perfect example of lobbying. But instead of drug companies whispering in the ears of the WHO, it is global health organisations.

These multilateral health organisations essentially act as “stand-ins” for big pharma, that is, influence policy that benefits big pharma while at the same time providing a buffer for them.

So far, during the COVID-19 “pandemic”, GAVI, along with CEPI, have pumped $750 million into the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, while the BMGF have pledged billions of dollars for vaccine development in addition to having connections to almost all organisations involved with COVID-19 relief.

And let’s not forget that GAVI’s founding partners include the BMGF themselves! Along with the WHO, The World Bank and Unicef!

Over the past four years, between 2016 to 2020, the BMGF have donated $1.56 billion to GAVI, and to this day have strong ties with the Alliance. It is also interesting to note that over the last twenty years (2000-2020) 79% of GAVI’s funding came from public donors (governments), totaling $16.5 billion, with the remaining being private donors at around $4.3 billion.

That is a lot of tax-payer money.

So as we can see, the BMGF and GAVI have a symbiotic relationship, both of whom make up 20% of the WHO’s funding.

GAVI is no squeaky clean alliance either, from the GAVI wikipedia (emphasis mine):

“Public-sector workers and academics public health have criticized GAVI, and other global health initiatives (GHIs) with private-sector actors, saying that they have neither the democratic legitimacy nor the capacity to decide on public health agendas. Private donors often find it easier to exert influence through public-private partnerships like GAVI than through the traditional public sector. There is also criticism that staff at GHIs are often recruited directly from elite educational institutions, and have no experience in health care systems, especially those in poorer countries. Some WHO officials have privately criticized GAVI for infringing and weakening the WHO’s mandate.”

In my opinion, this is a fitting description of how Tedros Adhanom rose to power, or more accurately, was put into power by those who needed a front-man they could control.

With the amount of funding going to the WHO from the BMGF, It is no surprise that Bill Gates has close ties with with Tedros Adhanom.

Like two peas in pod, Bill Gates shares a common background with Tedros in that he also doesn’t have a medical degree, yet is outspoken about public health.

Bill Gates

Bill Gates is another high-profile public figure that has been granted hero-like status by the Legacy Media during this “pandemic”, despite having a background in software, not medicine.

But who exactly is Bill Gates and how far does his influence and money reach?

Well, we will get to the man himself soon, but first I want to add some missing pieces to the BMGF connections list we discussed earlier. As a quick refresher, the BMGF have ties to:

• WHO: leading and coordinating the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic response (largest donor)
• CEPI: financing development of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (co-founder)
• GAVI: financing development of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (founding partner & member)
• GLOPID-R: network coordinating COVID-19 funding (member)
• IAVI: collaborating with Merck to develop an investigational vaccine against COVID-19 (Multiple grants)
• NIH: working on COVID-19 vaccine / therapeutic solution (donor and consultant)
• NIAID: developed mRNA-1273 vaccine with Moderna (provided grant)
• Moderna: COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273) development (provided grant)
• European Commission: proposing legislation and implementing decisions (multiple grants)
• Novavax: COVID-19 vaccine development (provided grant)
• AstraZeneca: COVID-19 vaccine development (provided funding through GAVI and CEPI)

Last article I mentioned that the European Commission (EC) had raised over $8 billion for a COVID-19 vaccine and was channeling this money into CEPI, GAVI, The Global Fund and Unitaid. We have already covered CEPI and GAVI’s ties to the BMGF, but what about Unitaid and The Global Fund?

I wonder if our boy William Gates has anything to do with them?

First, let’s see what Unitaid actually do. From their wikipedia (emphasis mine):

Unitaid is a global health initiative that works with partners to bring about innovations to prevent, diagnose and treat major diseases in low- and middle-income countries, with an emphasis on tuberculosis, malaria, and HIV/AIDS and its deadly co-infections. …

Unitaid supports programs that are implemented by organizations such as Coalition Plus, the Clinton Health Access Initiative, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Expertise France, The Global Fund, Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics, Médecins Sans Frontières, Medicines for Malaria Venture, Stop TB Partnership, TB Alliance, UNICEF and others.

From Unitaid’s own website (emphasis mine):

“Geneva  — Unitaid warmly welcomes the extension of a long-term partnership with the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation with a new commitment of US $50 million, bringing the foundation’s total contribution to Unitaid to US $150 million since 2006.”

OK, so Unitaid is dedicated to stopping global diseases such as HIV/AIDs and is connected to the BMGF through a long-term financial partnership.

And what about The Global Fund, what are they all about? From their wikipedia (emphasis mine):

“The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (or simply the Global Fund) is an international financing and partnership organization that aims to “attract, leverage and invest additional resources to end the epidemics of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria to support attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals established by the United Nations“.”

Again we have an organisation focused on eliminating HIV/AIDs. They are also supporting the attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals set by the United Nations. This will be important for later.

Do they have any connections to the BMGF?

Well, it probably wont be a surprise to find out that the BMGF provided initial seed funding for The Global Fund and since its inception in 2002 have donated $2.24 billion to the organisation. In addition they have committed to donate $760 million more between 2020 and 2022.

So yes, they are majorly connected..

As we can see, the $8 billion raised by the European Commission (EC) for a COVID-19 vaccine is being channeled into organisations who are heavily involved with the BMGF:

• CEPI
• GAVI
• Unitaid
• The Global Fund

We covered how CEPI and GAVI are involved with the COVID-19 response, but what are the roles of Unitaid and The Global Fund during this “pandemic”?

Well as mentioned on their wikipedia page, Unitaid supports programs implemented by The Global Fund, Unicef and Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI). Through CHAI, Unitaid has invested more than $400 million over the last decade into HIV medicine for children. This will be important for later.

Visiting Unitaid’s website shows how both themselves and The Global Fund are being utilised as part of the WHO’s “ACT Accelerator”:

(ACT Accelerator = Access to COVID Tools Accelerator)

Where CEPI and GAVI are involved with vaccines.

Unitaid in therapeutics.

And The Global Fund in diagnostics.

These diagnostics include the PCR test:

The Global Fund is working with partners and governments around the world to procure of and provide access to PCR Tests, primarily to low and middle income countries.

Wait, the same PCR test that was ruled unreliable by a Portuguese court recently?

The same test whose inventor, Kary Mullis, said “… with PCR, if you do it well, you can find almost anything in anybody”?

Yes.

And if this wasn’t enough, a recent external review of the “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” publication, put out by Eurosurveillance in January, 2020, shows that they had not isolated the SARS-CoV-2 virus when developing the PCR diagnostic methodology:

I need to emphasise that to date (as of November 27, 2020), no validation has been performed by the authors of the original report based on isolated SARS-CoV-2!

The reviewers emphasise that the COVID-19 PCR test is useless:

The other major diagnostic test The Global Fund is involved with is the Rapid Test:

The Global Fund is working within a global partnership to ensure COVID-19 rapid tests are available for low- and middle-income countries. They even admit themselves that the rapid tests released on the market in the early stages of the “pandemic” were unreliable:

As you can see the Global Fund, an initiative the BMGF helped kick-start, is involved in distributing the two primary diagnostic tests for COVID-19; one of which is completely unreliable and the other, very questionable.

These are the tests that are accelerating the “casedemic” phenomenon we are seeing, that is, testing more people to create more cases, even though the mortality rate remains the same. The PCR Tests accelerate this phenomenon due to the large percentage of false positives they produce.

These artificial spikes get amplified by the media, which then provides an excuse for global health authorities to push out a “life saving” COVID-19 vaccine.

To really hammer it home:

• WHO -> Coordinates global response to COVID-19 “pandemic”
• European Commission -> Pumps billions of tax-payer dollars into Unitaid, The Global Fund, GAVI and CEPI
• Unitaid works closely with The Global Fund
• The Global Fund -> Helps distribute PCR and Rapid tests that create false positives and accelerate casedemic
• Legacy Media -> Reports increase in cases to keep people in fear
• GAVI & CEPI -> Push out a rushed vaccine
• All organisations have ties to the BMGF

Yes, this is simplified and only represents a few cogs in the overall machine, but you get an idea of how it works.

It should also be noted that The Global Fund pledged to provide up to $1 billion dollars to governments and health leaders, to fight COVID-19:

So as we can see, almost ALL the major players we have discussed so far, who are involved in vaccine development and allocation of funding for COVID-19, have (or have had) significant connections with the BMGF. Let’s update the list:

• WHO: leading and coordinating the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic response (largest donor)
• CEPI: financing development of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (co-founder)
• GAVI: financing development of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (founding partner & member)
• GLOPID-R: network coordinating COVID-19 funding (member)
• IAVI: collaborating with Merck to develop an investigational vaccine against COVID-19 (Multiple grants)
• NIH: working on COVID-19 vaccine / therapeutic solution (donor and consultant)
• NIAID: developed mRNA-1273 vaccine with Moderna (provided grant)
• Moderna: COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273) development (provided grant)
• European Commission: proposing legislation and implementing decisions (multiple grants)
• Novavax: COVID-19 vaccine development (provided grant)
• AstraZeneca: COVID-19 vaccine development (provided funding through GAVI and CEPI)
• The Global Fund: funding governments and health leaders to fight COVID-19 & providing diagnostics (seed funding and continual funding)
• Unitaid: providing COVID-19 therapeutics and diagnostics (donor)

Self Existence, what are you getting at here…?! Are you saying that there is some sort of conspiracy involving Bill Gates!?

There can’t be, he is billionaire philanthropist trying to make the world a better place!

Right…?

If that is your current thought process, you were once like me, young and naive, fooled by the clever PR campaign to transform this once hated tech overlord into a sweater wearing superhero “doing his part for this planet”. I mean, this is the same guy funding research to block out the Sun, known as the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment (SCoPEx), in order to help fight climate change…

He also has other cartoonishly super-villain-esque ventures, such as genetically modified mosquitoes (through Oxitech), and artificial breast milk to help fight climate change (*rolls eyes*).

On May 1, 2020, The Corbett Report put together an amazing four part docu-series on Bill Gates which basically tells you everything you need to know about him:

1. How Bill Gates Monopolized Global Health
2. Bill Gates’ Plan to Vaccinate the World
3. Bill Gates and the Population Control Grid
4. Meet Bill Gates

If you decide to power ahead without watching the series, here are some important points from the investigation:

(WARNING: Text-wall incoming. There is a summary at the end if you feel the urge to skip through.)

“Gates is held up as a hero for donating $35.8 billion worth of his Microsoft stock to the foundation, but during the course of his “Decade of Vaccines,” Gates’ net worth has actually doubled, from $54 billion to $103.1 billion.

There’s the Gates-founded and funded Meningitis Vaccine Project, which led to the creation and testing of MenAfriVac, a $0.50-per-dose immunization against meningococcal meningitis. The tests led to reports of between 40 and 500 children suffering seizures and convulsions and eventually becoming paralyzed.

There’s the 2017 confirmation that the Gates-supported oral polio vaccine was actually responsible for the majority of new polio cases and the 2018 follow up showing that 80% of polio cases are now vaccine-derived.

There’s the 2018 paper in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health concluding that over 490,000 people in India developed paralysis as a result of the oral polio vaccine between 2000 and 2017.

There’s even the WHO’s own malaria chief, Dr. Arata Kochi, who complained in an internal memo that Gates’ influence meant that the world’s leading malaria scientists are now “locked up in a ‘cartel’ with their own research funding being linked to those of others within the group” and that the foundation “was stifling debate on the best ways to treat and combat malaria, prioritizing only those methods that relied on new technology or developing new drugs.”

…

Anthony Fauci, meanwhile, has become the face of the US government’s coronavirus response, echoing Bill Gates’ assertion that the country will not “get back to normal” until “a good vaccine” can be found to insure the public’s safety.

Beyond just their frequent collaborations and cooperation in the past, Fauci has direct ties to Gates’ projects and funding. In 2010, he was appointed to the Leadership Council of the Gates-founded “Decade of Vaccines” project to implement a Global Vaccine Action Plan—a project to which Gates committed $10 billion of funding. 

…

The Gates’ stated plan is to reduce population growth by improving health. But the idea of using vaccines as sterilization agents—even without the public’s knowledge or consent—is not conspiracy lore, but documentable fact.

It its 1968 annual report, the Rockefeller Foundation addressed the “Problems of Population,” lamenting that “[v]ery little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.” The Foundation vowed to correct this problem by funding “established and beginning investigators to turn their attention to aspects of research in reproductive biology that have implications for human fertility and its control.”

…

This sudden interest in digital identity was no mere passing fancy for the vaccine alliance. Gavi doubled down by becoming a founding member of the ID2020 Alliance, a public-private partnership dedicated to spearheading a global digital biometric identity standard. Other founding members of the alliance include Gates’ first company, Microsoft, and The Rockefeller Foundation.

In 2018, Gavi issued a call for innovation in digital technologies “for finding, identifying and registering the most vulnerable children.” The call specifically requested technologies for capturing, storing and enrolling the biometric details of infants on “rugged biometric devices.”

Berkley continued to follow up on this idea in public engagements as one of the new core missions of Gavi.

Although vaccines and identity may seem unrelated, Bill Gates has spent the last few years funding research that can bring the two ideas together.

Late last year, Gates once again turned to Robert Langer and his MIT colleagues to investigate new ways to permanently store and record the vaccination information of each individual. The result of their research was a new vaccine delivery method. They found that by using “dissolvable microneedles that deliver patterns of near-infrared light-emitting microparticles to the skin,” they could create “particle patterns” in the skin of vaccine recipients which are “invisible to the eye but can be imaged using modified smartphones.”

Rice University describes the quantum dot tags left behind by the microneedles as “something like a bar-code tattoo.”

So who was behind this development? As lead researcher Kevin McHugh explains:

“The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation came to us and said, ‘Hey, we have a real problem—knowing who’s vaccinated [. . .] So our idea was to put the record on the person. This way, later on, people can scan over the area to see what vaccines have been administered and give only the ones still needed.”

The microparticles that form the fluorescent quantum-dot tags are delivered along with the vaccine, but they cannot be delivered by a traditional syringe. Instead, they must be delivered by a patch of microneedles made from a mixture of dissolvable sugar and a polymer, called PVA, as well as the quantum-dot dye and the vaccine.

It should be no surprise, then, that Big Pharma vaccine manufacturers—in their scramble to produce the coronavirus vaccine that, Gates assures us, is necessary to “go back to normal”—have turned to a novel vaccine delivery method: a dissolvable microneedle array patch.

As is becoming evident, this new vaccine-delivered bar- code-like tattoo is about much more than simply ensuring that children get all their Gavi-recommended immunizations.

On a recent “Ask Me Anything” thread on reddit, when asked “What changes are we going to have to make to how businesses operate to maintain our economy while providing social distancing?” Bill Gates answered: “Eventually we will have some digital certificates to show who has recovered or been tested recently or when we have a vaccine who has received it.”

In his answer, Gates fails to mention that he has himself been instrumental in kickstarting and funding the research into the very type of digital certificates for vaccination that he is speaking about, or that these “digital certificates”—likely, at first, to be a digital marker linked to a biometric ID—could very well one day take the form of vaccine-implanted quantum-dot tattoos.

The ID control grid is an essential part of the digitization of the economy. And although this is being sold as an opportunity for “financial inclusion” of the world’s poorest in the banking system provided by the likes of Gates and his banking and business associates, it is in fact a system for financial exclusion. Exclusion of any person or transaction that does not have the approval of the government or the payment providers.

In Gates’ vision, everyone will receive the government-mandated vaccinations, and everyone will have their biometric details recorded in nationally administered, globally integrated digital IDs. These digital identities will be tied to all of our actions and transactions, and, if and when they are deemed illegal, they will simply be shut off by the government—or even the payment providers themselves.

…

Beginning in August of last year, a string of information connecting Bill Gates to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein began to emerge.

Flight logs revealed that Gates had flown on Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet.

An email surfaced showing disgraced MIT Media Lab Director Joi Ito—who resigned from his position after it was discovered that he had helped cover up Jeffrey Epstein’s identity as an “anonymous” donor to the lab—informing his staff that a $2 million donation to the lab in 2014 was a “gift from Bill Gates directed by Jeffrey Epstein.”

…

So, the question remains: Is Bill Gates motivated by eugenics? Given that eugenics went underground over half a century ago, we are unlikely ever to unearth a frank admission along those lines from Gates himself. After all, there are no longer any card-carrying members of the American Eugenics Society; the society was rebranded in the 1970s when, as the society’s founder noted, “it became evident that changes of a eugenic nature would be made for reasons other than eugenics, and that tying a eugenic label on them would more often hinder than help their adoption.”

But there was an American Eugenics Society in the 1920s, and it just so happened to boast a “William H. Gates” on its member roster. But perhaps that is just a coincidence.

And there was an American Eugenics Society in the 1960s, when William H. Gates II was preceded as head of Planned Parenthood by Alan Guttmacher, who simultaneously served as the Director of the American Eugenics Society.

And perhaps it was coincidence that the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation organized their London Summit on Family Planning, at which the Gates recommitted themselves to funding population control in the third world, in July 2012, on the anniversary of the First International Eugenics Congress, held in London exactly 100 years prior.”

If we really want to compress all that data on Bill Gates into a few key points:

• He wants to curb population growth by improving health, primarily through vaccinations
• Based on his family history, he is likely a closet eugenicist
• His foundation has a very bad track record with vaccines used in developing countries (i.e polio in India)
• He wants to implement a digital ID control grid
• He had close ties to Jeffery Epstein
• He has close ties with Dr. Anthony Fauci

On May 19, 2020, Children’s Health Defense outlined how Bill Gates influences global messaging and censorship:

From the article:

“Facebook and Google hired “FactChecker” (Politifact) to censor vaccine misinformation.

The Gates Foundation is “FactChecker’s” largest funder.

In his article, “Facebook “Fact-Checker” Misinforms Users about Vaccine Safety” investigative journalist Jeremy Hammond concludes, “Facebook is guilty of misinforming its users about vaccine safety. . . .They have no problem with lies about vaccine safety and effectiveness, as long as it’s intended to persuade parents to vaccinate their children.”

On May 4, 2017, FactChecker declared false Del Bigtree’s statement, “Vaccines include aluminum and mercury, which are neurotoxins, and vaccines cause encephalopathy.”

FactChecker explained, “Current data show vaccines are safe and do not cause toxicity or encephalopathy.”

Manufacturers’ inserts reveal that many vaccines contain aluminum and mercury, and cause encephalopathy.

Finally, massive gifts to NPR and PBS buy Gates biased vaccine coverage from public media.”

Is it now starting to make a bit more sense why the Legacy Media have been pushing for a COVID-19 vaccine while heavily criticising other readily available treatments? And how Big Tech companies are censoring information that goes against The Empire, *ahem*, I mean the WHO.

Recall the very first news article I shared in Part 1:

The BMGF are the largest donors to the Poynter Institute/Politifact, the “fact checkers” squashing vaccine truth. They are also the largest financiers of the WHO, the global health organisation that met with big tech to stop coronavirus “misinformation” (basically how to bury and censor information). On top of all this, the medical authorities and MSM are in lock-step with one another in regards to a vaccine being our only hope.

What a coincidence, huh?

In Part 2 of this series we also discovered that Bill Gates is:

• Funding various COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers through the various organisations he runs and/or help set up (CEPI, GAVI, BMGF etc.)
• Pushing for indemnification for these COVID-19 vaccine manufacturers and governments (who will help distribute and potentially mandate these vaccines)
• Building factories for seven leading COVID-19 vaccines to accelerate development
• Influencing the COVID-19 response by being apart of GLoPID-R, the network in charge of COVID-19 funding (a big conflict of interest in my opinion)

And now we discover, through the Corbett Report’s amazing investigation, that he wants to control population growth through vaccines, is likely a closet eugenicist and wants to implement a digital control grid...

We have already established that there isn’t really a pandemic, just a perception of one, which makes you wonder why these people want a vaccine delivered to everyone for a virus with a 99.7% survival rate? Why many governments and businesses are in the process of mandating these rushed vaccines? And why governments are pushing forward legislation to protect the companies developing them?

I hope you are starting to see the bigger picture now.

Yes, it is scary.

I really think The Corbett Report should have named their investigation:

[The] WHO is Bill Gates.

So let’s update the BMGF connection list:

• WHO: leading and coordinating the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic response (largest donor)
• CEPI: financing development of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (co-founder)
• GAVI: financing development of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (founding partner & member)
• GLOPID-R: network coordinating COVID-19 funding (member)
• IAVI: collaborating with Merck to develop an investigational vaccine against COVID-19 (Multiple grants)
• NIH: working on COVID-19 vaccine / therapeutic solution (donor and consultant)
• NIAID: developed mRNA-1273 vaccine with Moderna (provided grant)
• Moderna: COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273) development (provided grant)
• European Commission: proposing legislation and implementing decisions (multiple grants)
• Novavax: COVID-19 vaccine development (provided grant)
• AstraZeneca: COVID-19 vaccine development (provided funding through GAVI and CEPI)
• The Global Fund: funding governments and health leaders to fight COVID-19, providing diagnostics (seed funding and continual funding)
• Unitaid: providing COVID-19 therapeutics and diagnostics (donor)
• Jeffery Epstein: Mossad pedophile who ran honeypot operation from his island “Little Saint James” (flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet, provided $2 million donation to MIT lab through JE)
• Dr. Anthony Fauci: White House Coronavirus Task Force (part of the Gates-founded “Decade of Vaccines” project, on the BMGF GGCSB between 2003 to 2010)
• The Poynter Institute/Politifact: Censoring vaccine truth (largest donor to the Global Health Fact Checking Initiative)

One more fun tidbit I thought I would share before moving on is this book that was endorsed by Bill Gates:

Fitting, eh?

While I could go on about Bill Gates ad nauseam, I think it is time to shift our attention to some of the other important figureheads in the COVID-19 “pandemic”, such as Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Deborah Birx, who are both leaders within the White House Coronavirus Task Force.

Dr. Anthony Fauci

As touched on in previous articles, Fauci cannot seem to get his story straight, from severely overestimating the COVID-19 death count to not knowing whether to wear a mask, he has been consistently inconsistent. The one thing he seems to be sure of is that life cannot return to normal without a COVID-19 vaccine; the exact same sentiment Bill Gates shares.

As touched on in the Corbett Report, this should come as no surprise as Fauci was appointed to the Leadership Council of the Gates-founded “Decade of Vaccines” project to implement a Global Vaccine Action Plan. On top of this, he sat on the BMGF Global Grand Challenges Scientific Board (GGCSB) between 2003 to 2010.

He also met (and perhaps knew/knows) Bill Gates Sr., George Soros and David Rockerfeller:

Like Bill Gates, Fauci also seems to hold Tedros Adhanom in high regards and has been in constant communications with him during this COVID-19 “crisis”:

Taking a quick look at Fauci’s career from his wikipedia (emphasis mine):

In 1968, Fauci joined the National Institutes of Health (NIH) as a clinical associate in the Laboratory of Clinical Investigation (LCI) at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. In 1974, he became Head of the Clinical Physiology Section, LCI, and in 1980 was appointed Chief of the Laboratory of Immunoregulation. In 1984, he became director of NIAID, a position he still holds as of 2020. In that role he has the responsibility for an extensive research portfolio of basic and applied research on infectious and immune-mediated illnesses. He has turned down several offers to lead his agency’s parent, the NIH, and has been at the forefront of U.S. efforts to contend with viral diseases like HIV/AIDS, SARS, the 2009 swine flu pandemic, MERS, Ebola and COVID-19.

He played a significant role in the early 2000s in creating the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief and in driving development of biodefense drugs and vaccines following the 9/11 terrorist attacks.

As you can see he has been heavily involved with the NIH since the late 60’s and has been director of its “subsidiary”, the NIAID, since 1984. He was also a key figure in helping set up the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), which will be important for later.

While Fauci has been inconsistent with his story and blatantly pushing the vaccine narrative, things really didn’t start heating up for him till April, 2020, after it was discovered that the NIAID had been funding the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) to undertake risky coronavirus research:

“In 2019, with the backing of NIAID, the National Institutes of Health committed $3.7 million over six years for research that included some gain-of-function work. The program followed another $3.7 million, 5-year project for collecting and studying bat coronaviruses, which ended in 2019, bringing the total to $7.4 million.

Many scientists have criticized gain of function research, which involves manipulating viruses in the lab to explore their potential for infecting humans, because it creates a risk of starting a pandemic from accidental release.

SARS-CoV-2 , the virus now causing a global pandemic, is believed to have originated in bats. U.S. intelligence, after originally asserting that the coronavirus had occurred naturally, conceded last month that the pandemic may have originated in a leak from the Wuhan lab.”

The guy that leads the the White House Coronavirus Task Force also heads the NIAID…

The NIAID was funding controversial coronavirus research at the WIV that finished in 2019…

The virus started at the end of 2019 right next to where the WIV lab is located…

What an amazing coincidence, right?

As we go along you will start to see these “coincidences” build up.

Like Tedros Adhanom, Dr. Anthony Fauci has a very shady history which your “trusted” MSM sources would dare not touch with a 20ft pole.

This corruption really came to light when the documentary Plandemic was released in May, 2020. This expose rustled so many jimmies that it was immediately removed from Big Tech platforms and had “fact checkers” working overtime to discredit it.

The documentary revolves around Dr. Judy Mikovits, who discusses how her life was destroyed by Dr. Anthony Fauci:

From the documentary:

Dr. Judy Mikovits has been called one of the most accomplished scientists of her generation. Her 1991 doctoral thesis revolutionized the treatment of HIV/AIDS. At the height of her career, Dr. Mikovits published a blockbuster article in the journal Science. The controversial article sent shock waves through the scientific community as it revealed that the common use of animal and human fetal tissues were unleashing devastating plagues of chronic diseases.

For exposing their deadly secrets, the minions of Big Pharma waged war on Dr. Mikovits, destroying her good name, career, and personal life. Now, as the fate of nations hang in the balance, Dr. Mikovits is naming names of those behind the plague of corruption that places all human life in danger.

…

Dr. Mikovits: I was held in jail with no charges. I was called a fugitive from justice. No warrant. Literally drug me out of the house. Our neighbors are looking at what’s going on here. They search my house without a warrant, literally terrorize my husband for five days. They said, “If you don’t find the notebooks, if you don’t find the material,” which was not in my possession, but planted in my house.

Interviewer: As if you took intellectual property from the laboratory, is that correct?

Dr. Mikovits: Yes. It was intended to appear as if I took confidential material, names, and intellectual property from the laboratory. And I could prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that I didn’t.

Heads of our entire HHS colluded and destroy my reputation. And the Department of Justice and the FBI sat on it and kept that case under seal, which means you can’t say there’s a case, or your lawyers are held in contempt of court. So, you can’t even get a lawyer to defend you. So, every single due process right was taken away from me, and to this day, remains the same. I have no constitutional freedoms or rights.

…

Interviewer: — the man who is heading the pandemic task force [Dr. Fauci], was involved in a cover-up.

Dr. Mikovits: He directed the cover-up. And in fact, everybody else was paid off, and paid off big time, millions of dollars in funding from Tony Fauci, Tony Fauci’s organization, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease. These investigators that committed the fraud continue, to this day, to be paid big time by the NIAID.

…

Bill Gates: Normalcy only returns when we’ve largely vaccinated the entire global population.

Interviewer: If we activate mandatory vaccines globally, I imagine these people stand to make hundreds of billions of dollars, that own the vaccines.

Dr. Mikovits: And they’ll kill millions, as they already have with their vaccines. There is no vaccine currently on the schedule for any RNA virus that works.

Interviewer: So, I have to ask you. Are you anti-vaccine?

Dr. Mikovits: Oh, absolutely not. In fact, vaccine is immune therapy, just like interferon alpha’s immune therapy. So, I’m not anti-vaccine. My job is to develop immune therapies. That’s what vaccines are.

Just take 26mins out of your day at some point to watch this documentary. I also suggest watching Plandemic 2, as it corroborates her story and expands on this subject.

And if all this wasn’t enough, even the PCR inventor, Kary Mullis, didn’t hold Anthony Fauci in very high regard either, saying he knows practically nothing and is simply a bureaucratic figurehead:

Fauci will continue to pop up as we go on, but for now let’s move on to Dr. Deborah Birx, the White House Coronavirus Response Coordinator.

Dr. Deborah Brix

If you recall, Deborah Birx came out on April 7, 2020, and announced that anyone who dies with COVID-19, regardless of cause, will be added to the COVID-19 death count. This should have been the first indicator that she was a potential swamp creature.

I guess it won’t really be a shock to anyone when I say she has a long history with Dr. Fauci. From her Wikipedia (emphasis mine):

“From 1983 to 1986, she completed two fellowships in clinical immunology in the areas of allergies and diagnostics, where she worked in Anthony Fauci’s lab.

From 1985 to 1989, Birx was the assistant chief of the Walter Reed Allergy/Immunology Service. Birx started her career as a clinician in immunology, eventually focusing on HIV/AIDS vaccine research.

From 1986 to 1989, Birx worked at the National Institutes of Health as an investigator specializing in cellular immunology.

Birx returned to Walter Reed, where from 1989 to 1995 she worked in the Department of Retroviral Research, first as an assistant chief and then as chief of the division. 

She was lab director in HIV-1 Vaccine Development for a year. Birx became the Director of the United States Military HIV Research Program at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, a position she held for nine years, from 1996 to 2005. In that position, Birx led the HIV vaccine clinical trial of RV 144, the first supporting evidence of any vaccine being effective in lowering the risk of contracting HIV.

From 2005 to 2014, Birx served as the director of Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Division of Global HIV/AIDS, part of the agency’s Center for Global Health.

In January 2014, President Barack Obama nominated Birx to be the Ambassador at Large and U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator as part of the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) program.”

Dr. Birx worked in Dr. Fauci’s lab and eventually rose to the become the Ambassador at Large and US Global AIDS Coordinator for PEPFAR (through Obama), the program that Fauci helped create.

So is this nepotism or just pure coincidence?

Well, under the presidency of George W. Bush, Mark R. Dybul was appointed as the US Global AIDS Coordinator, leading the implementation of PEPFAR from 2006 to 2009.

Why is this important?

Because Mark R. Dybul also worked in Fauci’s Lab!

In addition, Dybul served as the executive director of The Global Fund from 2012 until 2017.

Looks like nepotism to me.

So as we can see, Dr. Deborah Birx is yet another figurehead of the COVID-19 “pandemic”, who has a history in immunology (and HIV/AIDS) and is towing the fast-tracked vaccine solution for COVID-19.

I wonder if she personally knows Bill Gates?

(@4EverAPatriot was also put into Twitter jail)

In March, 2020, the same month COVID-19 was declared a pandemic, Dr. Birx became a board member of The Global Fund. The same organisation that Bill Gates helped kick start.

So yes, she definitely knows Bill Gates.

These two leaders of the Coronavirus task force, Dr. Birx and Dr. Fauci, seem to be very chummy not only with Bill Gates, but with Democratic officials also (see above pictures)…

Let’s update our ever growing BMGF connection list:

• WHO: leading and coordinating the worldwide COVID-19 pandemic response (largest donor)
• CEPI: financing development of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (co-founder)
• GAVI: financing development of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine (founding partner & member)
• GLOPID-R: network coordinating COVID-19 funding (member)
• IAVI: collaborating with Merck to develop an investigational vaccine against COVID-19 (Multiple grants)
• NIH: working on COVID-19 vaccine / therapeutic solution (donor and consultant)
• NIAID: developed mRNA-1273 vaccine with Moderna (provided grant)
• Moderna: COVID-19 vaccine (mRNA-1273) development (provided grant)
• European Commission: proposing legislation and implementing decisions (multiple grants)
• Novavax: COVID-19 vaccine development (provided grant)
• AstraZeneca: COVID-19 vaccine development (provided funding through GAVI and CEPI)
• The Global Fund: funding governments and health leaders to fight COVID-19, providing diagnostics (seed funding and continual funding)
• Unitaid: providing COVID-19 therapeutics and diagnostics (donor)
• Jeffery Epstein: Mossad pedophile who ran honeypot operation from his island “Little Saint James” (flew on Jeffrey Epstein’s private jet, provided $2 million donation to MIT lab through JE)
• Dr. Anthony Fauci: White House Coronavirus Task Force (part of the Gates-founded “Decade of Vaccines” project, on the BMGF GGCSB between 2003 to 2010)
• Dr. Deborah Birx: White House Coronavirus Task Force (Global Fund board member)
• The Poynter Institute/Politifact: Censoring vaccine truth (largest donor to the Global Health Fact Checking Initiative)

OK, back to Dr. Birx.

As mentioned a moment ago, in January 2014, Dr. Birx became the Ambassador at Large and U.S. Global AIDS Coordinator of the PEPFAR program.

Why is this important?

Because PEPFAR, the program Dr. Anthony Fauci helped create, is the largest donor to The Global Fund.

The very same Global Fund Bill Gates helped set up.

Birx is the Ambassador of PEPFAR and sits on the board of The Global Fund.

To this day, PEPFAR has received around $90 billion of US government funding with $19 billion of this being funneled into The Global Fund.

So why am I telling you all this?

Because many researchers have come to the conclusion that PEPFAR and The Global Fund are most likely part of a Global Slush Fund!

Feeling a bit lost? Totally understandable. Here is a flow chart to help visualise it a bit better (click to enlarge):

PEPFAR and The Global Fund

Yes, you read the earlier statement right, these billion dollar health organisations are most likely part of a global slush fund. Corey’s Digs has done an amazing multi part series on this subject:

This is a huge research piece that I suggest you go and read because there is only so much information I can relay. But to give you a taste, here is the trailer for the book:

BitChute link.

This is Corey’s summary of the 1st Chapter:

“In the 80s and 90s an AIDS epidemic was manufactured via blood. Coincidentally, Bill Clinton was central to that, as it originated out of Arkansas. Then, once Bill became president, he and Bill Gates set the Global Fund into motion, with the help of many clown organizations. Bill passed the proper Bills and Executive Orders to carry this through to George W. Bush, who then stepped up to the plate and proposed PEPFAR, which later brought him good fortune. Meanwhile, Bill Gates was working on getting his vaccines rockin’ and rollin’ so he could push them through all of the same countries, while creating the finance mechanism for the HIV drugs, receiving funding from over 25 countries directly to GAVI, the Global Fund’s arm, and the UNDP was readying themselves for their significant role in overseeing much of this. Moments after Bill Clinton left office, once the stage was set, Bill and Hillary created their own initiative to be included in the grand exchange of funds between all of these organizations, and went on to receive hundreds of millions in funding. Hillary used her leverage as Secretary of State to promote her own (illegal) organization, while masterfully creating an “Obama will save the world from AIDS” campaign with her counterpart, Cheryl Mills. Of course, Barack Obama happily obliged by astronomically increasing PEPFAR’s donations to the Global Fund. Shortly thereafter, everyone who was connected to the Clintons, jumped aboard. After all, there was a lot of money to be made in this $25 billion-a-year market, and the taxpayers were unknowingly coughing up the funds for this venture. Over 35 governments wanted in on the action, and the citizens of those countries should be equally concerned as to how these funds are being distributed.

In short, U.S. taxpayers are forced to give their hard-earned money to the government, who has funneled $90 billion dollars of it to NGOs with a substantial amount to the Global Fund. Meanwhile, big pharma is lining the pockets of politicians. The Global Fund is in charge of distributing the funds to numerous organizations and NGOS, many of which are located in the US, as well as health ministries throughout developing countries. And yes, Clinton Health Access Initiative is one of the recipients, in addition to George Soros’ Open Health Institute, among many other familiar faces. Yet, the drugs repeatedly have issues with making it to the alleged victims of HIV, some have been watered down, millions in funds have mysteriously vanished, and the founding board member and chairman of the Global Fund did a 2-year stint in prison for securities fraud. Simultaneously, U.S. patients who are suffering from HIV cannot afford the $39,000/year treatment that is only costing $75/year for nearly the same treatment in developing countries. This is how your hard earned money is being spent – all $90 billion dollars worth. Wouldn’t it be grand if taxpayers were allowed to vote on where their money is being distributed? Wouldn’t it be spectacular if the U.S. government didn’t provide immunities and protections to these organizations and big pharma, so that they can be held accountable, as opposed to taxpayers paying for injury and death claims behind closed doors, such as the $4.1 billion paid out over vaccines?

The system was brilliantly put in place by suspect individuals long ago. Big pharma and billionaires fund the politicians. The politicians pass legislation favorable to the billionaire’s NGOs. The government funnels taxpayer dollars to the NGOs. They in turn funnel the money back and forth among themselves, with millions allegedly vanishing in the process, and when the politicians leave office, they reap the benefits as well through their own NGOs. Or, in the Clinton’s case – they played the no shame game and happily took in millions while still in positions of power within our government – highly illegal. It’s really a simple process. Why are people being charged income tax on labor? Now you know. This is only one example, there are trillions of taxpayer dollars being frivolously spent on nonsense and lining the pockets of corrupt billionaires. Even Sen. Rand Paul points out the frivolous spending on an annual basis. Why is it every corrupt politician with a salary of less than $300,000 a year miraculously becomes a multi-millionaire? It’s not difficult to figure out. There is no conspiracy in numbers, and they have all left a trail of coins.”

And this is only a summary of the first chapter… As you can see, it gets convoluted very quickly. Our good friend George Soros even makes an appearance (who is one of the largest donors to COVID-19 relief). For the remainder of the article, I will refer to the organisations he funds as being part of the Saucy Soros Division, or the ᛋᛋ Division for short (if you don’t get it, check the link above).

Remember earlier when I mentioned that Unitaid has invested more than $400 million over the last decade into the Clinton Health Access Initiative (CHAI) to provide HIV medicine for children. You think all this money actually reached the children (in the form of medicine)?

The first part of Corey’s investigation highlights the three (former) presidents that were cashing in from these shenanigans over the past few decades:

• Bill Clinton
• George W. Bush
• Barack Obama

It now makes sense why Clinton and Bush were so hell bent on ensuring Trump didn’t dismantle the program:

From the article:

“Clinton went on to say that the election of 2016 that ushered in the Trump administration was “a dark time” but he knew it was “time to rally, not retreat.” So he immediately called his predecessor George W. Bush, whom he praised for creating PEPFAR (The United States President’s Relief Fund for AIDS Relief), to tell Bush that “they” would be coming for the fund and so Clinton helped him strategize so they would be sure Trump couldn’t dismantle the program.”

Being in the position he was in, it is no surprise that Dr. Anthony Fauci knew (knows) The Three Stooges:

With how much money is being thrown around between governments, NGOs, global health organisations and multilateral institutions, Dr. Judy Mikovits’ claim of millions being spent on a cover up is well within the realm of possibility, particularly when there is billions of dollars at stake. When you are in the mafia, you take care of your own.

These global health organisations can essentially shuffle money between themselves for whatever they want, and as we will soon see, make it hard to track.

Many of these organisations like to keep their mission statements and goals vague, so that it is difficult to measure any tangible results against these goals.

Eventually there will be so many dodgy front organisations to hide cash flow that they will start using the Corporate BS Generator to randomly generate their goals and mission statements, for example:

Our goals are to “Assertively coordinate progressive adoption” and “Completely evolve high standards in alignments“

– GENERIC FRONT ORGANISATION

Amazing Polly has also done great research on the Global Health Mafia including PEPFAR and The Global Fund (and is where I found lots of the information I presented earlier, so all credit to her). She was recently purged from YouTube like many other Truthers, so check her out on BitChute and support her work! These are the videos:

1. We Are Being Played – Introducing PEPFAR & Birx
2. Ukraine got PEPFAR Money – What did they use it for?

They give a good snapshot of how global health organisations and multilateral institutions connect and overlap.

I will give an overview of key points presented in the above videos as they relate directly to PEPFAR and The Global Fund (with my own information weaved through).

As we know already, PEPFAR has donated around $19 billion to The Global Fund since its inception. The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) is one of the largest administrators and overseers of Global Fund programs. It also manages Global Fund grants and is present in over 25 countries. The US has also allocated funding to the UNDP for specific programs.

But here’s the kicker:

The UNDP internal policy does not allow outside entities to examine their books! This was brought to light by the US Senate in 2011:

Referring to the Senate Committee Print above, the Inspector General (IG) at the Global Fund was only able to inspect around one third of $9.9 million in disbursements and found that around 75% had been misappropriated… And this is only $3.5 million out of the billions of dollars that The Global Fund has raised…

This is not the only instance of Global Fund corruption:

From the article (emphasis mine):

“… on the back of investigative work carried out in Ghana, Tanzania and the Democratic Republic of Congo. In the DRC, for example, journalist Francis Mbala reported that the poorest people still have to pay for their medicine, despite donor countries giving money to the Fund so that they could be provided free of charge. It emerged that the reason for this state of affairs was that staff in health centres often went months without being paid, so they saw selling the medicine as their only option.”

Billions of dollars to help people in the poorest countries, but they still have to pay for medicine…

In addition, RFI published an article last year detailing more corruption around The Global Fund:

From the article (emphasis mine):

“Nigeria’s Premium Times, which leads with the revelations by the Office of the Inspector-General (OIG), an independent arm of the organisation, says that up to two-thirds of funds in some of the reviewed grants to the Global Fund have disappeared into the hands of corrupt officials.”

No surprises here.

In the Fiscal Year of 2019, out of the blue, Deborah Birx, through PEPFAR, increased the yearly HIV/AIDS Research contribution to the Ukraine by 66% when compared to previous years. This was given to Ukraine Ambassador Marie Louise Yovanovitch, who after being let go by President Trump in May 2019, came out as a star witness in the impeachment trial against him. What a coincidence, huh! Particularly because we know Birx rubs shoulders with many Democratic officials such as Nanci Pelosi, who has been leading the charge on Trump impeachment.

This is also interesting because in early 2020, a Ukrainian HIV charity was being probed for embezzlement:

We see that our good friend George Soros shows up in the mix through one of his ᛋᛋ Division fronts. Soros also shares the same sentiments as many of our other globalist friends: that Orange Man is bad and should leave the White House. The following quote is from The Washington Times:

“Mr. Soros, who was being interviewed by the Rome newspaper on the occasion of his 90th birthday, warned that Mr. Trump “remains very dangerous,” despite seeing him as transitory, because of his efforts to stay in power and avoid prosecution.”

He, like other globalists, is all for a “new normal” and for “global transformation” through this “pandemic”:

“I would describe it as a revolutionary moment when the range of possibilities is much greater than in normal times,” he said. “What is inconceivable in normal times becomes not only possible but actually happens. People are disoriented and scared.”

These world elites are practically licking their lips over this “pandemic” because it brings them one step closer to their goal of centralised global power (which we will cover next article). However, one problem still remains for them, and that is President Trump and his allies.

Why?

Well, to put it simply, because he isn’t a member of the club (in my opinion) and is why we saw four years of non stop “Orange Man Bad!” rhetoric.

So early on in the pandemic, when President Trump said the following:

“We are doing everything we can each day to confront and ultimately defeat this horrible, invisible enemy”

– President Donald J. Trump (March 22, 2020)

Many researchers and anons saw this as a coded message that Trump (and allies) are fighting back against the globalist’s shadowy plan to transform the globe, through actions such as:

• Cutting ties with the WHO
• Reducing funding to PEPFAR
• Suggesting cheap, effective and existing treatments for COVID-19 (such as HCQ)
• And pulling out of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) deal

Anyway, I think you get the idea. Let’s move on to some other global health organisations and see how they fit into this giant puzzle.

The Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB)

If you were like me before I researched this information, you probably have no idea what the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board (GPMB) is. They are basically a joint arm of The World Bank and the World Health Organisation (WHO):

Their mandate, according to their website, is to:

“Apprise key policymakers and the world of system-wide progress towards increased preparedness and response capacity for disease outbreaks and other emergencies with health consequences.”

Basically, tell powerful policymakers to put systems in place to manage the response during outbreaks.

Like the last section I will be sharing an outline of Amazing Polly’s work (with my own information weaved through) as she covers the GPMB extensively.

Her key videos are here:

1. The Global Health Mafia Protection Racket
2. MORE Public Health Mafia Connections

Earlier we covered how the European Commission had raised $8 billion in donations for a COVID-19 vaccine and would be sinking this money into organisations such as CEPI, GAVI, The Global Fund and Unicef. Well a large portion of the money raised came from governments all around the world. This is a short compilation of government leaders speaking at this fundraising event:

As you can see it looks like they are all reading from a script…

It’s almost as if all these leaders are all subsidiaries to a larger holding company…

Anyway, the president of the European Commission and host of the fundraising event, Ursula von der Leyen, went on to introduce various key stakeholders who would benefit from this fundraising such as:

• The WHO
• The World Bank
• International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA)
• The World Economic Forum (WEF)
• The BMGF
• GAVI
• CEPI

As expected, we see many of the usual suspects. Keep the WEF in mind, because they will pop up again later.

At one point von der Leyen made a special point to thank Dr. Victor Dzau, board member of the GPMB, in which she says (paraphrasing): that without him none of this would be possible.

Dzau is not only a board member of the GPMB but also the President of the United States National Academy of Medicine (NAM). Von der Leyen’s statement, that none of the fundraising would have happened without Dr. Victor Dzau, is kind of a big deal, as it implies he was the head honcho who brought together all the above-mentioned organisations and government officials.

This makes sense because the GPMB is all about outbreak response, but more specifically: the policy making surrounding a response.

And what sort of “policies” do we see being rolled out in the world right now? Well, we have:

• Unscientific mask mandates
• Unconstitutional and unjustified lock downs
• Forced COVID-19 testing in countries such as NZ, Canada and Australia
• Quarantine camps in Canada
• Potentially a mandated rushed vaccine

Makes you wonder if these policies/rules were pushed by they GPMB to help manage this “pandemic”?

And wouldn’t you know it, our friend Dr. Anthony Fauci sits on the board of the GPMB also!

As well as:

• Ms Henrietta Fore, Executive Director of Unicef
• Dr. Chris Elias, Global Development Program of the BMGF
• Sir Jeremy Farrar, Director of the Wellcome Trust
• Dr. George F. Gao, Director-General of the Chinese CDC

It is also interesting that Dr. Victor Dzau (NAM) and Dr. George F. Gao (Chinese CDC Director-General) were both born in China and sit on GPMB board, when the WHO themselves have been criticised for being too easy on China early in the outbreak and for being too “China-centric” in general:

Piecing together some information we have uncovered so far:

• The WHO is too China-centric.
• The WHO is one half of the GPMB.
• The GPMB has Dr. Anthony Fauci on their Board.
• Dr. Anthony Fauci is the head of the NIAID.
• The NIAID backed controversial coronavirus research in Wuhan (China), which ended in 2019.
• The coronavirus outbreak started in Wuhan at the end of 2019.

Not only this, but in 2017, Fauci himself said that the Trump administration will no doubt be challenged by a “surprise global outbreak”:

And wouldn’t you know it, the BMGF has ties to China also:

From the article:

“A Chinese government entity that has partnered with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation led a delegation of public health experts to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in December 2018, after the lab had already begun its bat coronavirus research funded by Dr. Anthony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).”

Nope, nothing odd here, move along people…

Now at this point some of you may be thinking:

“Wait, are you saying this pandemic was planned? If it was planned they did a pretty poor job of wiping everyone out”

Well, to be honest, I am not 100% sure, there are a lot of moving parts that work the shadows. Either way, this global health mafia seems to be working towards a goal which we will touch on a bit later.

A few months before the outbreak began, in September 2019, the GPMB put out an annual report that was an aggregation of reports put together by organisations they commissioned (including themselves):

Some of the organisations who supplied reports include:

• The WHO and The World Bank (essentially the GPMB)
• The Johns Hopkins University Center for Health Security
• The Wellcome Trust

Including one report put together by the “Independent Oversight and Advisory Committee for the WHO Health Emergencies Programme”:

New normal, eh? Interesting…

We can see that the funders of this initiative (that produced the GPMB Annual Report) include:

• The BMGF
• Wellcome Trust
• Germany (Angela Merkel)

In addition, a special mention was made to Tim Evans, who was the Senior Director of Health, Nutrition and Population at the World Bank up until this report was published in September 2019. This will be important for later.

Some of the key points from the document include:

Remember the video of governments leaders practically reading from a script earlier? Looks like they were upholding their “binding obligations”, no?

A “whole-of-government” and “whole-of-society” approach… Sounds a bit like communism or totalitarianism to me.

The IDA is a member of the World Bank Group.

You can see that this report demands continual funding to the IDA, Global Fund and GAVI. As Amazing Polly points out, the GPMB (WHO and World Bank) essentially produced an annual report that demands funding to themselves (via the IDA)! They also demand funding to GAVI and the corrupt Global Fund, two BMGF “affiliates”.

Again, the GPMB are pushing for member states to fund the WHO, which is essentially themselves.

Anyone else getting mafia vibes? Everyone MUST listen to the GPMB for preparedness.

OK, so back to Dr. Victor Dzau and the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).

The NAM has received donations and gifts from various organisations including the BMGF:

The BMGF also sit in various oversight committees for initiatives the NAM has kick-started, such as the International Commission on a Global Health Risk Framework for the Future (GHRF):

You will also see familiar names such as the WEF, Wellcome Trust and the Rockefeller Foundation.

The BMGF also sits on steering committees:

I think you get the point, the BMGF is heavily involved with the NAM.

While Dzau’s professional history is quite long, a few key institutions he has been involved in include:

• The advisory committee to the NIH (who funds the NIAID, which has been Fauci-run since 1984)
• The Board of Health Governors of the World Economic Forum (WEF)
• CEPI (A BMGF seeded organisation)

Some notable institutions he is presently involved in:

• Chair of the International Advisory Board of the new McGill School of Population & Global Health (McGill SPGH)
• Board member of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
• Board member of Imperial College Health Partners (ICHP)

Here is Dzau on the current board of the ICHP:

This is important because it was the Imperial College model that over-estimated projected COVID-19 deaths and pushed many countries into lock-down.

Like Dzau, the Imperial College London is also a member of the ICHP.

The following article discusses the person behind the flawed Imperial College model:

From the article (emphasis mine):

Neil Ferguson is the British academic who created the infamous Imperial College model that warned Boris Johnson that, without an immediate lockdown, the coronavirus would cause 500,000 deaths and swamp the National Health Service.

Johnson’s government promptly abandoned its Sweden-like “social distancing” approach, and Ferguson’s model also influenced the U.S. to make lockdown moves with its shocking prediction of over two million Americans dead.

Johan Giesecke, the former chief scientist for the European Center for Disease Control and Prevention, has called Ferguson’s model “the most influential scientific paper” in memory. He also says it was, sadly, “one of the most wrong.”

The article goes on to say that Ferguson had a bad track record of predicting epidemic outcomes:

“In 2005, Ferguson predicted that up to 150 million people could be killed from bird flu. In the end, only 282 people died worldwide from the disease between 2003 and 2009.

In 2009, a government estimate, based on Ferguson’s advice, said a “reasonable worst-case scenario” was that the swine flu would lead to 65,000 British deaths. In the end, swine flu killed 457 people in the U.K.”

Ferguson’s incompetence didn’t stop there:

“Last March, Ferguson admitted that his Imperial College model of the COVID-19 disease was based on undocumented, 13-year-old computer code that was intended to be used for a feared influenza pandemic, rather than a coronavirus. Ferguson declined to release his original code so other scientists could check his results. He only released a heavily revised set of code last week, after a six-week delay.”

Hmm… Suspicious undocumented code that was 13 years old and was meant to be used for an influenza pandemic… On top of that he did not let other scientists check his code until he had heavily revised it.

The article concludes by asking:

“So the real scandal is: Why did anyone ever listen to this guy?”

Well, first of all, because he is a part of the UK’s Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE).

And second of all, because of one Dr. Victor Dzau!

A current member of the ICHP and GPMB.

Neil Ferguson —> Imperial College London —> ICHP <— Dr. Victor Dzau —> GPMB

Given Ferguson’s track record, why would anyone use his models? It’s almost as if he’s the guy the Medical Mafia calls upon when they need some “science” to help them further an agenda.

Remember in Part 1 of this article series how Anthony Fauci over-estimated the total COVID-19 deaths due to poor modelling?

Here is a reminder:

Well, according to the National Review article above, it was the Imperial College model that pushed the US to lock-down.

Fauci also sits on the board of the GPMB with Dr. Victor Dzau!

The way I see it is, this dodgy model was requested and pushed by bad actors within the GPMB (Dzau and Fauci) to create panic around the world. This panic then gave an excuse for lockdowns and provided the WHO with further justification to declare COVID-19 a pandemic. Once the pandemic was officially declared by the WHO, policies that the GPMB help put in place in its member countries (before hand) came into effect, including cash flow to the IDA, GAVI and the corrupt Global Fund, all of whom have ties to the BMGF!

This of course was working in parallel with many other factors such as the artificial inflation of COVID-19 numbers which I covered in Part 1 of this series.

You think governments around the world would listen to the GPMB and ensure that policies put in place are followed?

I would say so.

Gotta love these coincidences.

Still not entirely convinced on Dzau’s influence?

As mentioned earlier, he is a board member of the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME):

This is significant because the IHME are also modelling projected COVID-19 deaths:

We already know that these death rates are extremely manipulated and inflated, but notice how they are projecting lower deaths with (unscientific) mask use and a rushed vaccine?

The IHME are also modelling projected COVID-19 infections:

They are also projecting lower COVID-19 infections with (unscientific) mask use and a rushed vaccine. I wonder if they have taken into account the casedemic phenomenon that is being amplified by the useless PCR tests?

You know, the PCR tests that are being pushed out via the Global Fund.

You know, The Global Fund, the organisation Dr. Deborah Birx sits on the board of…

The organisation the BMGF helped kick-start and continually funds…

And this isn’t even the grand climax.

The BMGF have provided funding to both the Imperial College London and the IHME!

In 2017, the BMGF provided a ten-year, $279 million grant to IHME to “expand its work”.

In March 2020, the same time the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic, the BMGF awarded a $79 million grant to the Imperial College London!

Of course this money was not granted for anything COVID related but “to develop a new tool for malaria control and elimination in sub-Saharan Africa”

Yeah, right.

I speculate that this was a payout to Neil Ferguson for tanking his career and becoming an international disgrace. You know, for that “science” the Medical Mafia needed.

A quick overview of this section before we move on:

The GPMB and China Overview:

1. The WHO’s largest donor is the BMGF
2. The WHO is too China-centric.
3. The WHO is one half of the GPMB.
4. The GPMB has Dr. Anthony Fauci on their Board.
5. Dr. Anthony Fauci is the head of the NIAID.
6. The NIAID backed controversial coronavirus research in Wuhan (China), which started around 2014 and ended in 2019.
7. In late 2018, a Chinese government entity that had partnered with the BMGF led a delegation of public health experts to the WIV
8. Fauci said that the Trump administration will no doubt be challenged by a “surprise global outbreak”
9. The coronavirus outbreak started in Wuhan at the end of 2019.

The GPMB and the Imperial College Model Overview:

1. Dr. Victor Dzau sits on the board of the GPMB and ICHP
2. The Imperial College model, put together by Neil Ferguson, grossly overestimated COVID-19 deaths by millions
3. Neil Ferguson and Dr. Victor Dzau are connected through the ICHP
4. This was potentially modelled incorrectly on purpose
5. This flawed model sent the world into lock-down and helped justify the WHO’s declaration of COVID-19 as a pandemic
6. The pandemic status then triggered policies to come into effect that the GPMB help put in place in its member countries before hand; including funding to themselves, GAVI and the corrupt Global Fund
7. The Imperial College London was granted $79 million from the BMGF around the same time the WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic
8. I would speculate that this was a payment for “science” the Medical Mafia required to push their agenda

The GPMB and the IHME overview:

1. Dr. Victor Dzau sits on the board of the GPMB and IHME
2. The IHME is the organisation currently modelling projected COVID-19 infection and death rates in the USA
3. Their projections conveniently show less deaths and infections if mask mandates continue or a rushed vaccine is pushed out
4. The BMGF have been pushing a COVID-19 vaccine from the very beginning
5. In 2017, the BMGF provided a ten-year, $279 million grant to IHME to “expand its work”

The GPMB general overview:

1. Dr. Victor Dzau and others, through the GPMB, are ensuring preparedness policies they helped set up with governments are followed, as stated in their 2019 Annual Report
2. This Annual Report coincidentally was released just a few months prior to the COVID-19 outbreak
3. Dr. Victor Dzau has ties to organisations pushing false COVID-19 models, namely the ICHP and IHME
4. These false models forced many countries to comply with the GPMB advised preparedness policies
5. The policies/rules we see being rolled out over the world include: mask mandates, social distancing, lock downs, rushed vaccine roll outs etc. with more to come.
6. These policies are a key part of their global transformation agenda (which we will cover next article)
7. I would speculate many key health leaders around the world know these models are false and are part of the scheme
8. The GPMB 2019 Annual report demanded continual funding to themselves and other corrupt organisations such as The Global Fund

Event 201: A Global Pandemic Exercise

As many of you already know, Event 201 was a global pandemic exercise held a few months before the actual COVID-19 outbreak. Here is a synopsis of the event from their website:

“Event 201 was a 3.5-hour pandemic tabletop exercise that simulated a series of dramatic, scenario-based facilitated discussions, confronting difficult, true-to-life dilemmas associated with response to a hypothetical, but scientifically plausible, pandemic. 15 global business, government, and public health leaders were players in the simulation exercise that highlighted unresolved real-world policy and economic issues that could be solved with sufficient political will, financial investment, and attention now and in the future.”

You can watch the highlight reel here:

Here are a few key points from this global pandemic exercise:

• The pandemic exercise used a novel coronavirus as the outbreak disease
• It was primarily respiratory in nature
• The disease originated from animals
• A primary concern was that a vaccine couldn’t be developed in time
• A travel lock-down was implemented during the exercise
• The worldwide economy crashes with predictions it would take up to a decade to recover
• There is a huge focus on flooding the space with good information (i.e. authoritative news)
• There was an emphasis on getting funding to various multilateral health organisations

This event is significant because it predicted everything we are seeing in this COVID-19 outbreak!

These guys must be psychic! What another amazing coincidence.

Again, we see familiar players involved in putting this event together, namely:

• The BMGF
• Johns Hopkins University
• World Economic Forum (WEF)

And who were the participants of the event you ask?

From the Event 201 website:

Some notable participants include:

• Sofia Borges – UN Foundation – Senior Vice President and Head of the New York office
• Dr. Chris Elias – BMGF – President of the Global Development Program
• Timothy Evans – McGill University School of Population and Global Health (SPGH) – Director and Associate Dean
• Professor George F. Gao – Chinese CDC – Director-General
• Jane Halton – ANZ Bank, Clayton Utz, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, and the US IHME – Board Member. CEPI, COTA and Vault Systems – Chairman
• RADM Stephen C. Redd – Public Health Service and Implementation Science at the CDC – Deputy Director
• Hasti Taghi – “Major media company” (MSM) – Chief of Staff
• Adrian Thomas – Global Public Health at Johnson & Johnson – Vice President

Let’s explore who these people are and see how they tie into what we have been discussing so far.

There is a lot to unpack here so I will try to keep it brief.

Sofia Borges and the UN Foundation is noteworthy because of their focus on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) put forth by the United Nations (UN) under the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The United Nations Development Program (UNDP), which we discussed earlier with respect to The Global Fund, is also heavily involved in this agenda and are in charge of implementing these SDGs. If you recall, it was the UNDP internal policy that does not allow outside entities to examine their books! And that the Inspector General (IG) at the Global Fund found 75% of funds were being misappropriated by the UNDP!

We will be delving into Agenda 2030 more next article.

Next we have Dr. Chris Elias and the BMGF. I don’t really need to add much dialogue here, as we have covered the BMGF ad nauseam.

Remember when I said to keep Tim Evans in mind earlier?

Well, that is because he is the current Director and Associate Dean of the McGill University SPGH. The very same McGill University SPGH which our friend Dr. Victor Dzau chairs the International Advisory Board of! On top of this, Tim Evans co-founded GAVI, worked for the WHO between 2003 and 2010 as Assistant Director General, and was the Senior Director of Health, Nutrition and Population at the World Bank between 2013 and 2019!

It was Tim Evans that was given a special thanks in the GPMB 2019 Annual Report we discussed earlier. The report that emphasised funding to themselves and the Global Fund as a key part of preparedness.

And it was this guy emphasising funding goals during Event 201!

Next is Professor George F. Gao, the Chinese CDC Director-General. I don’t think I need to say much on this besides the obvious fact that COVID-19 started in China and that the WHO is too China-centric.

Jane Halton is an interesting player here as she sits on the board of a lot of organisations. One of which includes the IHME, which Dr. Victor Dzau sits on the board of, and as we discussed earlier, is the organisation pushing out the dodgy COVID-19 models:

Halton also chairs the board of CEPI, which Dr. Victor Dzau also used to be on the Leadership Board of (between 2017 and 2018)!

So she is definitely well acquainted with Dr. Victor Dzau.

Halton is also heavily involved in health, finance and policy in Australia as she was the head of the Department of Health between 2002 and 2014, the head of the Department of Finance between 2014 and 2016 and is currently a board member of the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI).

This is interesting as we know Dzau and the GPMB are all about Preparedness Policy.

I wonder if she was key to putting in place Preparedness Policy in Australia?

Halton also sat on the Executive Board of the WHO between 2004 and 2007, was President of the World Health Assembly in 2007 and was a Chair of the OECD Health Committee between 2007 and 2012.

So yeah, Jane Halton is kind of a big deal.

The other notable organisation she is involved with, as mentioned in her Event 201 profile, is COTA, the Council on the Ageing in Australia.

Here she is with the other directors:

This association with COTA raised a big red flag for me, as aged care has been a hot topic in Australia with respect to COVID-19.

If we look at COTA’s website we can see what their goals are:

Am I crazy or does that vision statement make no sense?

COTA also states what they have been doing to help the elderly during COVID-19:

This is interesting when we see headlines in Australia such as:

From the article (emphasis mine):

“It suggests the Morrison government was responsible for “significant failings in the aged care sector prior to, and during, the pandemic”. The report also notes that deaths in aged care facilities “account for 74.6% of all deaths from Covid-19 in Australia”.”

Hmmm… Three quarters of all COVID-19 deaths in Australia were from people in aged care…

This high mortality rate among the elderly led to strict aged care lockouts:

From the article:

“Premier Daniel Andrews said visiting residential aged care, where 588 lives have been lost to coronavirus, will not return to normal until a vaccine becomes available or until a rapid test, which could screen visitors as they arrive, was developed.”

Essentially they are keeping the elderly hostage until there is a COVID-19 vaccine.

And of course, being a member of CEPI, Jane Halton is/was pushing for this rushed vaccine (2:50 min mark):

She was also emphasising “preparedness” and the need to convince people to spend on preparedness (2:30 min mark):

This was a common theme heard throughout Event 201 and a prime directive of the GPMB; keep money flowing to these shady health organisations. She also emphasised the need for more testing, which again, creates casedemics.

Victoria, Australia, has seen some of the most draconian lock-down measures in the world based on a relatively small number of COVID-19 deaths, 75% of which have been in aged care.

Now as we discussed in the very first article, the COVID-19 numbers are being heavily manipulated and inflated, so why would Australia be any different?

Listening directly to the Chief Health Officer of Victoria, Brett Sutton, we can see that the classification system is just as loose as the US:

Dr. Mark Hobart provides more evidence that the death rates among the elderly are are being manipulated:

Dr. Hobart was called in to treat patients in a nursing home after a “significant COVID-19 outbreak”. He gives testimony that there was no evidence of respiratory infection among those who had tested positive.

In addition, he states that many people are dying in nursing homes with coronavirus not from coronavirus, such as a patient he had who died from a blood clot. This patient tested COVID-positive and hence was labeled a coronavirus death according to Brett Sutton.

On top of all this, influenza disappeared in Australia right after COVID-19 was declared a pandemic (March, 2020):

Add all this to the dodgy testing and false positives and you get a large spike in false coronavirus cases and deaths among the elderly.

This is important to understand because Australia, mainly Victoria, has been using the “elderly angle” when it comes to implementing COVID-19 health measures. As in, “we need these unconstitutional ‘new normal’ laws and policies to protect the elderly! Don’t be a #grandmakiller!”.

And it is COTA that is vital in developing some of these policies!

They are the ones who helped develop the Aged Care Industry Code:

And they also happen to be working with the Department of Health, politicians, decision makers, health organisations, aged care providers and media organisations with respect to COVID-19!

And what a coincidence it is that Jane Halton, who is a Chairman of COTA, also attended Event 201, sits on the board of the IHME with Dr. Victor Dzau and is also a board member of CEPI! She also works in policy, something Dr. Victor Dzau knows a lot about, through the GPMB!

I think you get the idea.

I was meant to keep this brief… Moving on…

Next we have Stephen C. Redd, Deputy Director of Public Health Service and Implementation Science at the CDC. I don’t think I need to say much on this. In Part 1 we already discussed how the CDC has been shrouding its data in vagueness throughout this “pandemic”, so it’s no surprise to see them at Event 201.

Hasti Taghi represented the main stream media (MSM) at Event 201. Her bio on the Event 201 website was somewhat vague:

We see that she has ties to the WEF and your run-of-the-mill Legacy Media outfits such as CBS and NBC.

Looking at her LinkedIn profile reveals her official title: a convoluted blend of industry buzz-words with enough vagueness to ensure you don’t actually know what she does:

We also find out that she has experience within the healthcare industry and the government:

And when she attended Event 201 she was actually the Vice President of NBCUniversal!

From her history it looks as though she has experience in communication management during health crises. I wonder why her bio on the Event 201 website was so vague?

Maybe because NBCUniversal is no small fish; here are just a few of their brands:

You can go to their wikipedia to see a list of assets owned by NBCUniversal… It is immense.

As we have all experienced this past year, the Legacy Media have been tenacious with their deceptive and fear-mongering narrative. I guess they are just playing their part as laid out in Event 201, that is, “Flooding The Zone” with “good” information (aka propaganda).

The Medical Mafia brings the dodgy numbers and the Legacy Media reports them.

Finally we get to Adrian Thomas, the Vice President of Global Public Health at Johnson & Johnson. I thought this was worth a mention since BARDA pumped $500 million into Johnson & Johnson for COVID-19 vaccine development.

As we can see, Event 201 was practically a training simulation for these bad actors, preparing them for the roll-out of COVID-19, an event that in my opinion was completely premeditated and planned ahead of time. Whether the virus was meant to be more deadly, or if it actually even exists, I am not sure. But from all the data we have covered over the last three articles, we know that they are leading society in a particular direction, which is towards a New Normal; a buzzword that ties in with the United Nations’ Agenda 2030 and the WEF’s Great Reset and Fourth Industrial Revolution.

Before I wrap up this section (and article) I want to touch on the World Economic Forum (WEF) for a moment to see how they tie into this global medical mafia. The reason I have left them for last is because they lead nicely into the next article.

As seen above, the WEF was one of the hosts of Event 201.

And as we discussed earlier:

• They were a key part of the European Commission’s ($8 billion) fundraiser for a COVID-19 vaccine
• They are heavily involved with the NAM (the organisation Dr. Victor Dzau heads)
• Dr. Victor Dzau was on the WEF’s Board of Health Governors
• They helped kick-start CEPI (along with BMGF and others)

But what do they actually do? Well according to their wikipedia page, the WEF is:

“Committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic, and other leaders of society to shape global, regional, and industry agendas”

They are essentially a globalist NGO that was founded and currently led by Klaus Shwab. And they are the NGO pushing the Great Reset and Fourth Industrial Revolution:

To put it bluntly, these two agendas are working hand-in-hand to transform the World into a transhumanist, machine-led society. In this society we are tracked for our own safety, we own nothing, and everything is digital (including ourselves). This of course is being driven by the climate change agenda and sustainable development goals put forth by the United Nations. I bring all this up because COVID-19 is being used to accelerate this goal:

They are pushing the idea that lockdowns produced an overall reduction in carbon emissions and thus our current behaviour in society must me maintained to help stop the big bad climate change.

We will dive more into this in the next article so I will stop here. The main point was to show the connection of the WEF to the rest of the Global Medical Mafia and that they are all working together to bring about this technocratic vision of the future.

The COVID-19 Grand Unifying Global Medical Mafia Flowchart

To summarise everything we have discussed so far would be far too difficult due to the convoluted nature of it all, so I have put together a just as convoluted flow chart to show all the connections of this Global Medical Mafia (click to enlarge):

But if I were to give a general summary of everything we have discussed in this article series, it would be:

In Part 1 we established the following:

1. The artificial inflation of COVID-19 deaths
2. The use of blatant propaganda from the Main Stream Media (MSM)
3. Censorship of dissenting voices by Big Tech

In Part 2 we established the following:

1. The vilification and suppression of cost effective, safe and easily dispersed treatments
2. The fast tracking of a vaccine from multilateral organisations with indemnification for manufacturers and governments
3. WHO officials saying their will be no end to the pandemic even with a vaccine

Now, in Part 3 we have established the following:

1. Evidence of corruption among many organisations and individuals within the medical and “global health” industry
2. The incestuous and interconnected nature of these organisations and individuals
3. The BMGF being connected in some way to almost all organisations involved with COVID-19
4. The agenda to transform the world using COVID-19 as a catalyst

Thanks for reading and stay tuned for Part 4.

WWG1WGA!

ॐ

God Bless.